SBMUpdated 23 Oct 2026
Early version, updated weekly. Every claim is dated and sourced. Think something is wrong? Dispute it.
Map / 0. Fights / Selling the finished work

Headcount-billed IT services

R0 Fightstoward Selling the finished workCost-curve loopRetiringWatch
Placement: a judgment drawn from the evidence, open to correction (dispute it). As a rung 0 model it carries the family its value is moving toward.

The model

Definition
IT services billed on the number of engineers staffed.
What presses on it
TCS cut about 12,000 roles in 2025.
What still holds it up
TCS attributes the cuts to skills mismatch, not AI. Held on watch until a company links the change to AI.
Stops working when
The pressure above is the case against it. A stated end condition for retiring models is not yet written.

Evidence

Companies 1
Evidence items 1
Grades 0A 1B
Latest dated 2025-10-09
Counter-evidence 1

The three labels

0. Fights · loop gain negative. The curve shrinks what it charges for (seats, hours, heads, words, clicks).

Toward: Selling the finished work · money lands in the outcome, not the tool or the hours.

Cost-curve loop · cheaper models, lower unit cost, more volume, more revenue.

Same rung and family

Named companies 1 companies · grade per item

CompanyClaimDateGrSource
Tata Consultancy Services (TCS)
India · public · best B
TCS cut approximately 12,260 employees (about 1% to 2% of its workforce) starting July 2025; headcount fell from about 613,069 (Q1 FY26) to 593,314 (Q2 FY26), a sequential decline of 19,755; the company's own stated reason was 'skills mismatch,' not AI directly2025-10-09BBusiness Standard

Counter-evidence Reversals, failures and disputes

TCS's own HR chief attributed the 2025 job cuts to 'skills mismatch' among mid- and senior-level staff, not explicitly to AI; media coverage, not the company, made the AI linkage2025-10-09Business Standard

Sources 1

Business Standard business-standard.com · 2025-10-09